![]() ![]() I then discovered that I couldn't get datasheet view to work on ANY of my Windows machines! So I went to the final idea of creating a spreadsheet file from the SP 2007-based list (which after telling me it wouldn't work, did on the second attempt) and then used the "Create a List from a Spreadsheet" option in the SP2010-based site. This worked fine BUT I discovered that not only was the column called Category no longer in third place in the list of columns (as it was in the spreadsheet) but that it also had the wrong info (2010!) AND that it was no longer a column that could be deleted or changed - so I couldn't change it to Choice type as I needed to. So I didn't want to lose all that work. So when I finally got access to the SPF2013FAQ site I intended to create a copy of that SP 2007-based view in the SP 2010 site and use datasheet view in both to copy the date across in bulk. ![]() As the largest problem occurs probably because of the way a particular list was created, I'll need to explain just how I created the list so please bear with me. I had already in the v4 site created a URL List for 2003 documents and had already added a mass of links to it by the time the SPF 2013 site became available to me. (Later I'll try to compare the speeds of opening one of the very large lists in wssv4faq because I seem to remember that Briefcase Pro seemed snappier with large lists whereas SharePlus seemed snappier with normal sized lists). With the SP 2010 based site being tested there were problems with both products. SharePlus always coped well with views (at least since I first saw it and used it). Both seem to work fine with (my) SharePoint 2007-based sites. ![]() However for those of you who want to have off-line copies of sites you can use authentication with, I'll continue. The installation of both products and the adding of SP sites and specifying which Lists are to be shown goes smoothly. Earlier problems with Views (not choosing the correct default view unable to cope with grouped views) with Briefcase Pro, have vanished in the new version. They hadn't. Thus for all the rest of you who need anonymous access, the only product you can use to access any of my sites is XXXX ! Game Over. This piece will look at two iPad apps - Briefcase Pro (Colligo) and SharePlus (Infragistics) which is the free version of that product for which there is also a chargeable Pro version that I have not tested. The versions used were the very latest version of Briefcase Pro (the Update option only appeared in the App Store yesterday and wasn't there a day earlier) and a version of SharePlus that was downloaded a couple of months ago and which probably still is the current version. In order to make the test accurate, I added the (SP 2010 based) latest SPF2013FAQ site to SharePlus in addition to the WSSv4FAQ (SP 2007 based) site that was already there. The same two sites were also created in the new version of Briefcase Pro. So a level playing ground. The first test was to see if Colligo had removed the requirement of needing a name and password on specifying a site. Proactive sales managers provide you a prompt feedfack to all your requests and support for your growth planning.Īs an authorized partner you benefit from extensive marketing material and programs which we use to assist you in customer acquisition and communication.Īs an authorized partner you have full technical support delivered by technical professionals who offer structured and proactive support for your engineers.Īs an authorized partner you can learn all about our business communications solutions, as well as the latest developments and technologies in our iPECS training center and local field.Īs an authorized partner you have multiple chance to participate in exclusive events that are filled with opportunities for executive networking, sales & product strategy discussions and business development in global.IPad Apps for off-line copies of SharePoint sites tested and compared As an authorized partner you get a private service from a designated account manager at Ericsson-LG Enterprise. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |